Charles Barr, Vertigo
British Film Institute Film Classics

Obsession, pp. 7-20.
The entrance of Kim Novak in the film
- how shot and edited
the gaze, in relation to Laura Mulvey’s theory
three forms of gaze: character, camera/director, audience
how this affects us on second viewing
connection of Hitchcock and Elster, etc.
[skip the comparison between Hitchcock and Michael Powell]


Construction, pp. 21-31
collaborative nature of filmmaking, and Hitchcock’s collaborators on Vertigo
Bernard Herrmann’s score
the screenplay:
original source: D’entre les Morts
the screenwriters: Maxell Anderson, Alec Coppel, Samuel Taylor
- Taylor’s contributions:
- - Midge character
- - Judy’s confessional flashback
Vera Miles

Illusion, pp. 32-64
Vertigo as the dream of a dying man?
- possible parallel to story by Ambrose Bierce
- "oneiric narrative": parallel to Rear Window
Scottie as a “free floating” character
James Stewart’s age & star persona
Vertigo's quality of "rootedness"
Hitchcock’s concern for surface realism in settings

Parallel structure in scenes and segments:
- three “false-ending” scenes (Scottie’s second thoughts)
- interplay of dialogue and non-dialogue scenes
- point of view shooting in dialogue and non-dialogue scenes
"creative geography" in car scenes
Madeleine-Judy’s exhibitionism
uncanny elements (McKittrick Hotel, etc.)

“power and freedom” as theme & motif
“pivotal scene” in Scottie’s apartment after Madeleine’s leap into the Bay
“doubleness” of the Madeleine role and Kim Novak’s performance

Revelation, pp.65-80

the confession scene: its function? is it necessary?
point of view shooting in the Judy section
Scottie and Judy: the “stalemate” and remaking of Judy
climactic scene after Judy’s makeover
the necklace as plot device
repetitive point of view in the second drive south
the final scene
the omitted extra scene

"Interdependent and incompatible" narratives: romantic and paranoid
Hitchcock’s “double dimension”: accessible story, deeper playing out of inner desires
how guilty is Scottie?
how real is Elster?

Robin Wood’s revised interpretation of the ending:
- triumph and tragedy?
- wish fulfillment, or denial of otherness, or both?