Literaturliste zum Thema Willensschwche

1) Positionen der klassischen Antike (Sokrates, Platon, Aristoteles)

Allan, D. J.: The Practical Syllogism, in: Autour dAristote: Recueil dՃtudes de philosophie ancienne et mdivale offert Msgr. A. Mansion, Leuven 1955, 325-40.

Allen, R. E.: The Socratic Paradox, in: Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960), 256-265.

Anscombe, G. E. M.: Thought and Action in Aristotle, in: R. Bambrough (Hg.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London 1965, 143-158.

Bambrough, J. R.: Socratic Paradox, in: Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1960), 289-300.

Buckler, S.: Moral Weakness and Citizenship in Aristotle, in: Polis 10 (1991), 65-94.

Charles, D.: Aristotles Philosophy of Action, London 1984.

Dahl, N. O.: Practical Reason, Aristotle and Weakness of Will (Minnesota publications in the humanities, 4), Minneapolis 1984.

Dihle, A.: The Theory of the Will in Classical Antiquity, Berkeley 1982.

[dt.: Die Vorstellung vom Willen in der Antike, Gttingen 1985]

Dorion, L. -A.: Akrasia et enkrateia dans les Mmorables de Xnophon, in: Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 42 (2003), 645-672.

Gallopp, D.: The Socratic Paradox in the Protagoras, in: Phronesis 9 (1964), 117-129.

Gulley, N.: The Interpretation of No one does wrong willingly in Platos Dialogues, in: Phronesis 10 (1965), 82-96.

Irwin, T.:

   Platos Moral Theory, Oxford 1977.

   Platos Ethics, New York, 1995.

Kenny, A.: The Practical Syllogism and Incontinence, in: Phronesis 11 (1966), 163-184.

Mele, A. R.:

   Aristotle on Akrasia and Knowledge, in: The Modern Schoolman 58 (1981), 137-157.

   Aristotle on Akrasia, Eudaimonia and the Psychology of Action, in: History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985), 375-393.

Nussbaum, M. C.: Practical Syllogisms and Practical Science, in: dies., Aristotles De motu animalium. Text with Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays, Princeton 1978, 165-220.

Oksenberg-Rorty A.: Akrasia and Pleasure: Nicomachean Ethics Book 7, in: dies. (Hg.), Essays on Aristotles Ethics, Berkeley u. a. 1980, 267-284.

Owens, J.: The Acratics Ultimate Premise in Aristotle, in: J. Wiesner (Hg.), Aristoteles. Werk und Wirkung, Bd. 1, Berlin - New York 1985, 376-392.

Robinson, R.: Aristotle on Akrasia, in: J. Barnes / M. Schofield / R. Sorabji (Hg.), Articles on Aristotle, vol. 2, London 1977, 79-91.

Santas, G.:

   The Socratic Paradoxes, in: The Philosophical Review 73 (1964), 147-164.

   Platos Protagoras and Explanations of Weakness, in: The Philosophical Review 75 (1966), 3-33.

   Aristotle on Practical Inference, the Explanation of Action, and Acrasia, in: Phronesis 14 (1969), 162-189.

Thorp, J.: Aristotle on Brutishness, in: Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 42 (2003), 673-694.

Vlastos, G.: Socrates on Acrasia, in: Phoenix 23 (1969), 71-88

Walsh, J. J.: Aristotles Conception of Moral Weakness, New York / London 1963.

Wiggins, D.: Weakness of Will, Commensurability, and the Objects of Deliberation and Desire, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (1978/79), 251-277.

2) Mittelalterliche Autoren

Barad, J.: Aquinass Assent / Consent Distinction and the Problem of Akrasia, in: New Scholasticism 62 (1988), 98-111.

Chappell, T. D. J.: Aristotle and Augustine on Freedom: Two Theories of Freedom, Voluntary Action, and Acrasia, New York 1995.

Colvert, G. T.: Aquinas on Raising Cain: Vice, Incontinence and Responsibility, in: American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly Supplement 71 (1997), 203-220.

Doig, J. C.: Aquinass Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics: A Historical Perspective (The New Synthese Historical Library, 50), Dordrecht 2001. [v. a. 225-228 u. 262-265]

Gilbert, N. W.: The Concept of the Will in Early Latin Philosophy, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy 1 (1963), 17-35.

Hedwig, K.: Agere ex ignorantia. ber die Unwissenheit im praktischen Wissen bei Thomas von Aquin, in: I. Craemer-Ruegenberg / A. Speer (Hg.), Scientia und ars im Hoch- und Sptmittelalter. Festschr. fr A. Zimmermann, Bd. 1. Berlin - New York 1994, 482-498.

Hoffmann, T.: Lakrasia selon Duns Scot, in O. Boulnois u. a. (Hg.), Duns Scot  Paris. Actes du Colloque du 2-4 septembre 2002, F. I. D. E. M. Rencontres de philosophie mdivale, Turnhout. [im Erscheinen]

Ingham, M.: Ethics and Freedom: An Historical-Critical Investigation of Scotist Ethical Thought, Lanham 1989.

Kent, Bonnie D.:

   Aristotle and the Franciscans: Gerald Odonis Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, Ph. D. Thesis, Columbia University, 1984.

   The Good Will According to Gerald Odonis, Duns Scotus and William of Ockham, in: Franciscan Studies 46 (1986), 119-139.

   Transitory Vice: Thomas Aquinas on Incontinence, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989), 199-223.

   Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century, Washington 1995.

Knuutila, S. / Holopainen, T.: Conditional Will and Conditional Norms in Medieval Thought, in: Synthese 96 (1993), 115-132.

Korolec, J.:

   Le commentaire de Jean Buridan sur lEthique Nicomaque et luniversit de Cracovie dans la premire moiti du XV sicle, in: Organon 10 (1974), 187-208.

   Les principes de la philosophie morale de Jean Buridan, in: Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonarum 21 (1975), 53-72.

   Free Will and Free Choice, in: N. Kretzmann / A. Kenny / J. Pinborg (Hg.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge 1992, 629-641.

Kretzmann, N.: Warring against the Law of My Mind: Aquinas on Romans 7, in: T. Morris (Hg.), Philosophy and the Christian Faith, Notre Dame 1988, 172-195.

Krieger, G.: Der Begriff der praktischen Vernunft nach Johannes Buridanus (BGPhMA, N. F. 28), Mnster 1986.

Lottin, Odon: Psychologie et Morale aux XIIe et XIIIe sicles, Bd. III, Louvain - Gembloux 1949, 651-666 (A propos de  lintellectualisme moral  de saint Thomas dAquin).

Monahan, E. J.: Human Liberty and Free Will according to John Buridan, in: Medieval Studies 16 (1954), 72-86.

Mller, J.: Agere contra conscientiam. The Relationship between Weakness of the Will and Conscience in Albert the Great. [erscheint in den Kongressakten des 11th International Congress of Medieval Philosophy, Porto, 25-30 August 2002]

Peppermller, R.: Abaelards Auslegung des Rmerbriefes (BGPhMA, N. F. 10), Mnster 1972.

Potts, T. C.: Conscience in Medieval Philosophy, London 1980.

Reilly, R.: Weakness of Will: The Thomistic Advance, in: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 48 (1974), 198-207.

Ring, T. G.: Rmer 7 in den Enarrationes in Psalmos, in: A. Zumkeller (Hg.), Signum Pietatis. Festschrift fr C. Meyer, Wrzburg 1989, 383-408.

Saarinen, Risto:

   Moral Weakness and Human Action in John Buridans Ethics, in: H. Kirjavainen (Hg.), Faith Will and Grammar, Helsinki 1986, 107-139.

   John Buridan and Donald Davidson on akrasia, in: Synthese 96 (1993), 133-154.

   Weakness of the Will in Medieval Thought: From Augustine to Buridan (STGMA, 44), Leiden - New York - Kln 1994.

   Aristotles akrasia in Medieval Ethics, in: B. Carlos Bazn / Eduardo Andujar / Lonard G. Sbrocchi (Hg.), Les philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen ge, Moral and Political Philosophies in the Middle Ages. Actes du IXe Congrs international de philosophie mdivale, Bd. 2, New York - Ottawa - Toronto 1995, 922-931.

   Akrasia and Voluntarism: Replies and Afterthoughts, in: Timo Koistinen / Tommi Lehtonen (Hg.), Philosophical Studies in Religion, Metaphysics and Ethics. Essays in Honour of Heikki Kirjavainen (Schriften der Luther-Agricola-Gesellschaft, 38), Helsinki 1997, 239-253.

   Walter Burley on akrasia: Second Thoughts, in: Vivarium 37 (1999), 60-71.

   Die aristotelische Willensschwche im Mittelalter: Der Beitrag von Albertus Magnus, in: W. Senner (Hg.), Albertus Magnus. Zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: Neue Zugnge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, Berlin 2001, 235-242.

   The Parts of Prudence: Buridan, Odonis, Aquinas, in: Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 42 (2003), 749-765.

   Weakness of Will: The Plurality of Medieval Explanations, in: H. Lagerlund / M. Yrjnsuuri (Hg.), Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes, Dordrecht 2002, 85-97.

Stadter, E.: Psychologie und Metaphysik der menschlichen Freiheit. Die ideengeschichtliche Entwicklung zwischen Bonaventura und Duns Scotus (Verffentlichungen des Grabmann-Institutes, N. F. 12), Mnchen 1971.

Stegman, Th. D.: Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Problem of Akrasia, in: Modern Schoolman 61 (1988/89), 117-128.

Walsh, J. J.:

   Is Buridan a Skeptic about Free Will? In: Vivarium 2 (1974), 50-61.

   Some Relationships between Gerald Odos and John Buridans Commentaries on Aristotles Ethics, in: Franciscan Studies 35 (1975), 237-275.

3) Neuzeitliche Autoren, allgemeine Darstellungen
und neuere Diskussionsbeitrge

Anscombe, G. E. M.: Intention, 2. Aufl., Oxford 1963.

Audi, R.: Weakness of Will and Practical Judgement, in: Nous 13 (1979), 173-196.

Bradley, F. H.: Can a Man Sin against Knowledge?, in: Mind 9 (1884); ebenso in Collected Essays, Oxford 1935.

Bratman, M.: Practical Reasoning and Weakness of Will, in: Nous 13 (1979), 153-171.

Broadie, A. / Pybus, E.: Kant and Weakness of Will, in: Kant-Studien 73 (1982), 406-412.

Charlton, W.: Weakness of Will. A Philosophical Introduction, Oxford 1988.

Davidson: How is Weakness of the Will Possible, in: ders., Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford 1980, 21-42. [ursprnglich in: J. Feinberg, Moral Concepts, Oxford 1969, 93-113]

Frankena, W.: Hare on Moral Weakness and the Definition of Morality, in: Ethics 98 (1988), 779-792.

Frankfurt, H: Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person, in: Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971), 5-20.

Gosling, J.: Weakness of the Will, London 1990.

Grice, P. /Baker, J.: Davidson on Weakness of the Will, in: B. Vermazen / M. Hintikka (Hg.), Essays on Davidson: Action and Events, Oxford 1985, 27-49.

Hare, R. M.: Freedom and Reason, Oxford 1963 [v. a. Kap. 5].

Hintikka, J.: Was Leibnizs Deity an Akrates? In: S. Knuutila, Modern Modalities, Dordrecht 1988, 81-108.

Jackson, F.: Weakness of Will, in: Mind 93 (1984), 1-18.

Kenny, A.: The Practical Syllogism and Incontinence, in: Phronesis 11 (1966), 163-184.

Lukes, S.: Moral Weakness, in: Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1965), 104-114.

Mele, A.:

   Akrasia, Reasons, and Causes, in: Philosophical Studies 44 (1983), 245-268.

   Irrationality. An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception and Self-Control, New York - Oxford 1987.

Mortimore, G. W. (Hg.), Weakness of Will, London 1971.

Ong-Van-Cung, K. S.: Indiffrence et irrationalit chez Descartes, in: Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 42 (2003), 725-748.

Peacocke, C.: Intention and Akrasia, in: B. Vermazen / M. Hintikka (Hg.), Essays on Davidson: Action and Events, Oxford 1985, 51-73.

Pears, D.: Motivated Irrationality, Oxford 1984.

Pironet, F. / Tappolet, Ch.: Faiblesse de la raison ou faiblesse de volont: peut-on choisir? Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 42 (2003), 627-644.

Savile, A.: Spinoza, Medea, and Irrationality of Action, in: Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 42 (2003), 767-790.

Sidgwick, H.: Unreasonable Action, in: Mind 11 (1893), ebenso in Practical Ethics, London, 1898, 235-260.

Spitzley, Th.: Handeln wider besseres Wissen. Eine Diskussion klassischer Positionen, Berlin - New York 1992.

Stroud, S. / Tappolet, Ch. (Hg.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.

Taylor, C. C. W.: Plato, Hare and Davidson on Akrasia, in: Mind 89 (1980), 499-518.

Thalberg, I.: Remorse, in: Mind 72 (1963), 545-555.

Walker, A.: The Problem of Weakness of Will, in: Nous 23 (1989), 653-676.

Watson, G.: Skepticism about Weakness of Will, in: Philosophical Review 86 (1977), 316-339.

Wolf, U.: Zum Problem der Willensschwche, in: Zeitschrift fr philosophische Forschung 39 (1985), 21-33.