 Click on
Picture to Return to Canonical Jurisprudence |
A canon
from the Council of Poitiers in 1079 banning clergy from bearing arms became
part of the normative law of the church by the late twelfth century.
Council of Poitiers 1079
1 Comp. 3.1.2 (X 3.1.2):
Clerici
arma portantes et usurarii excommunicentur (Clerics
who bear arms or who are usurers may be excommunicated). |
|
Bernardus Parmensis,
Glossa ordinaria to X 3.1.2 s.v. Clerici arma: "Clerici arma portare
non debent, xxiii. questione ultima, Clerici et c. Quicumque (C.23 q.8 c.5
and c.6) sine iusta causa. Iustam causam intellige si per loca
periculosa transitum faciunt tunc possunt portare arma ad terrorem latronum,
licet percutere non debeant (Clerics
ought not to bear arms . . . without a just reason. You
may understand just reason if they travel through dangerous territories then
they may bear arms to strike fear into robbers, although they ought not to
strike)"
Emanuel Gonzalez Tellez,
Commentaria to X 3.1.2, vol. 3, p.6: "et ipsa naturalis ratio
permittat ut a periculis nos defendamus, l.
Itaque 4. ff. de iustitia et iure (Dig. 1.1.3),
unde ius hoc, ut arma armis repellere liceat, a natura comparatum dicitur,
l.1 § Vim vi 27 ff. de vi et vi armat
(Dig.43.16[15].1.27) . . .
Nec obstat
dubitandi ratio supra expensa nam a praesenti generali prohibitione
necessitatis casus
excipiendi sunt ut contra vim tum sibi tum patriae illatam armis sese
clerici defendere possint
. . . Eadem ratione si civitas ab hostibus oppugnatur,
clerici arma defensionis causa sumere possunt."
(Natural reason permits
that we defend ourselves from danger . . . consequently the law
that it is permitted to repel armed force with armed force is said to be
conferred by nature . . . Notwithstanding the reason for
doubting this above, in spite of the general prohibition, cases of
necessity must be excepted and clerics may defend themselves and their home
land . . . By the same reason if a city is beseiged by
enemies clerics can take up arms based on the principle of defense.") |